Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Hotel with outdoor pool, near Ala Moana Center
- Free WiFi in lobby
Good
Location
Great location
Value for money
Best value for money
Vibe
Vibe is not too good
Wellness Area
Wellness & sports facilities could be improved
TripAdvisor Traveller Rating: 4
From 1,956 reviews
Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Hotel Info: 6823 2342
from S$144- City View
- Diamond Head View
- Partial Ocean View
- Luxury Suite, 1 Bedroom, Kitchen
Recent reviews
Good 7.2 From 802 reviews
Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Very Good
Hotel is in a great location and we loved the balcony in the room. The hotel is retro in some ways, but comfortable and good value.
Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Very Good
Last stay
Last two nights living on Oahu
Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Very Good
Good value
This is the second time I have stayed here. It is a good value for Waikiki, but beware of the additional fees. There is a daily Resort Fee and the Transient Tax, which added an additional $37 per night to the final bill. There is also a parking fee of $25 per day plus tax. I prefer the Diamond Head view rooms. They are larger and you can see Diamond Head along with a peek of the ocean through the other buildings. (At least on the 7th floor!) The room had a refrigerator and a coffee pot, but no microwave. The furniture needs to be updated, but we didn't mind. The room fit our needs while still in our budget.
Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Good
Room had a number of issues with it, damaged walls, stained curtains from smoking (in a non smoking room), smoke alarm falling off the wall. The front desk said they were unaware and would get resolved and waived the resort fee.
Aqua Palms Waikiki - Honolulu
Fair
Buyer beware!
The rooms are sorely in need of renovation, made worse by the torn and dirty carpet. The bathroom is so small that you have to squeeze to the side of the toilet to shut the door.. very poor value for the money considering condition, size, cleanliness and non central location. Buyer beware!
Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us
